(909) 838-4587 ed [at] le-suspension.com

It’s time for Ducati to have some pride

No Japanese motorcycle manufacture has ever asked for special Moto GP rules. They win or lose on their merits and take pride in doing so. Ducati on the other hand asks for and gets special rules. We can argue forever about the merits of different rules to make the racing better, to get more bikes on the grid and so on. But in the premier world class? In a prototype class? This is not stick ball.

There are lots of good reasons for handicapped events of all kinds. When you play catch with your kid you don’t throw the ball as hard as you can. Fine. But what value does a front row start, a pole position, a podium finish or a win have if you can only get it because of special rules?

I feel best when I do my best. If that earns me a win, so much better. But I don’t race a 600 in the 250 Ninja class even though I’ll win for sure.

Suzuki did not ask for special rules, they regrouped and they will be back. They will get spanked but they will not ask for more fuel, softer tires or anything else. When they stand on the top step you will see in their faces, pride for a job well done, pride earned.

Better to take your lumps, then to take special treatment. It’s a good thing Ducati has a special customer base.

 

My friend MG over at  http://motorbikeroadracing.blogspot.com/ agrees with me on this.  Here is what he has to say:

I get what Dorna is doing in re: the Ducati Cup rules. They’re giving the company something to sell to the corporate owners, the bean-counters and the sponsors. Hey look, we got a front-row start! That keeps another factory from disappearing from the grid.
But you have to wonder about the knock-on effects; did a legit satellite team lose out on a front-row start or a podium because of the Ducati handicap? Who needs the sponsor money more, Ducati or Gresini?
I get that Ducati takes the road less traveled. But does that decision deserve special assistance if the road less traveled is less traveled by everyone else because IT’S FREAKING SLOWER????? THIS IS RACING, RIGHT! AUUUGGGHH! (Go watch some old Sam Kinison stand-up for the proper pronunciation of AUUUGGGHH!)
Just sayin’ …

Prime Meridian

Photo from NPR, thank you.

A little over a hundred years ago Great Britain won a war with China and more or less stole the island of Hong Kong for 100 years. Britain wanted a naval base and trading center in that part of the world. All part of their successful scheme for world power.

Over the course of the 100 year deal Hong Kong changed from a Colony ruled by a far away power into a representative government and an economic power house.

Now the people of Hong Kong are helping to speed political change in China. It won’t be fast and it will be messy but it will happen. The result will not be what we except, it will be what they want.

The list of problems caused by the British is long but the list of good work is longer. There is a reason that the Prime Meridian is in England.

Aragon 2014

I’m surprised by how little I’m seeing on FB about the Aragon race. I’m sure there is more social media going on than I’m seeing but when that much stuff happens I except to see more ranting from haters.

I think I know why there is so little BS about this race. It was a well organized event. It was run using the rules and the rules make sense. The track is challenging and low risk.

How low risk is the track? So low risk that first and second in the world championship were willing to keep going on slicks till they crashed. So low risk that of 3 crazy high speed crashes 2 resulted in no injuries to the riders and little damage to the bikes. One crash dazed the rider when his head whacked the ground. It must be said that one rider had to run so far to get back to his bike that he may have been a little out of breath. How is that for good run off room?

The Flag to Flag rule won’t work for most and it sounds a little odd but it sure is better than stopping the race. This rule has passed the only test that matters, it works.

How good are these guys? One guy was so much faster than everyone else that you wondered what the point of showing up was. But racers all know that it’s called racing for a reason and they are all racers.

Even the haters sometimes know when to keep their mouths shut.

What a Moto GP Race!

Yes, I think I will watch that race again. Right now.
I really like being able to watch races on my computer whenever I want as many times as I want. I like it so much that I happily pay extra for the privileged. Right now there are no ads but as long as you don’t cut away from the racing, I do want to see the ads from companies that support racing.
Hint. Hint! HINT!

All Four Bill Bikes

This note just in from Bill, the owner of the FZ-09 that I posted about his forks:

“Ed
Thanks and it’s always a pleasure doing business with you. I’ve already been out on a few fast sweepers and am completely happy with the work.
Bill”

Bill has four bikes, I now have his BMW1000S, it’s the last of the 4 to get the LE touch.

Thank you Bill!

“Decisions, Decisions …”

Over at http://motorbikeroadracing.blogspot.com/ my friend MG is bitching about how the MotoGP officials messed up when they made Folger give up a position then gave him a ride through plenty on the last lap because he did not give up the position in time.

It use to be that we raced on dangerous tracks, on unreliable bikes with useless gear. It use to be that when you cut the course you lost a lot of time off road riding. Now we race at nice tracks with paved run off room on fast bikes with great gear. Now when you cut the course you don’t crash and many times don’t even lose any ground but that’s not fair to the riders who stayed on the track.

So Folger cut the course somewhere. He knew he cut the course and he knew he did not give up the position. When he later got the give up one position board after pulling away from those guys he should have slowed way down so that they caught him at the slowest part of the track giving him the best chance of letting only the one guy past and the best shot at getting back ahead and the most remaining laps to go after the next guy. Instead he kept going like a track day rider waiting for his slow friend who is on the other side of the track.

Folger caused and compounded this problem. He should be penalized for messing up the battle behind him and for not following the rules, not fussed over because the officials looked like poor parents trying to deal with a bratty six year old.

As to what MG says about DMG’s last AMA Pro weekend, he is spot on.

Up-dated with MG response:  By the way, he is right.

Ed, you ignorant slut. (Thank you, Dan Akroyd and Saturday Night Live.)
This was about Race Direction blowing a call, not the boneheaded stuff the rider may or may not have done as well. Folger last made a move for position on Lap 13, and that was when a rider in front of him crashed. Before that, his last pass was on Lap Five. This was a racer in the top ten on the track. This wasn’t something that happened in the battle for 32nd.
And every lap after about Lap Five, the same thing happened – Folger lost a little ground to the rider in front of him, gained a little ground on the rider behind him. Which he did for the actual majority of the race before Race Direction decided to issue a penalty, by which point Folger couldn’t even see the riders behind him as he sat up on the front straight.
In such circumstances, a time penalty (if warranted) makes far more sense. What you saw was a dumb rule, with its dumbness compounded by extraordinarily poor enforcement.
You are correct – tracks are safer, paved runoff is (usually) safer. But in those circumstances, it becomes imperative for race officials to have sensible rules in place and to enforce them appropriately. Forcing riders to drop a place is a bad idea. Forcing someone to hang around and try to give up six seconds at the very end of a race and then wedge their way back into a pack is bad execution.
By the way, I was wrong and you are right – a track with crazy noise limits beats the no-track alternative, hands down.
Level III OCD

Level III OCD

20140912_133809

Look closely and you’ll see the top/left 3 boxes of gloves are right side up and the bottom/right 3 are up side down. Three rolls of shop towels and 2013 on Tony’s championship plate. I did not plan this, it happened all on it’s own…

Oahu Needs a Motorsports Park

Oahu Needs a Motorsports Park

Off Camber

This is an idea for that park:

The money problem can only be solved by a rich dude. Rich dudes are building dream tracks all over the country. A dream track in paradise is possible and it can make a profit.

Space is a big problem on a small island. Build a small track. 1/8 mile drag strip with road course. Infield pits and kart track. 1/8 mile dirt oval with infield motorcycle course. Short sand drag strip. Separate entrances for street and dirt tracks.

Noise is a big part of racing but is a bigger problem for the people who live near a track, thereby greatly reducing the possible locations for a track on a small island. Strict, self imposed and enforced noise limits. Air boxes and quite exhausts on all vehicles. Keep the race vehicles as quite as cars on the show room floor. Stock dirt bikes will be too loud but aftermarket exhaust makers can solve this problem. Apply this rule to generators too. A nice spin off of low noise is the PA system will cost less and you will be able to hear it.

There are fools who will say that it’s not racing without noise and that they make more noise with their street vehicle now. There are fools who will say that 1/8 mile drags are not real drag racing. There are fools who will say a ¾ mile track is too small and that the straight is not long enough. There are fools who will say all kinds of things about how this track is not good enough. All true, but you don’t have a track now do you? This argument leads to what you have now, no track. These fools did not race when you had a track and they won’t even if they lived in a place with a track. There are fools, don’t count them.

How Your Cartridge Forks Work

How Your Cartridge Forks Work

This photo shows a compression piston assembly taken apart on the left with the rebound piston assembly on the right. Starting on the bottom left is the compression holder that threads into the bottom of the cartridge body. Going up we see the compression stack, a bunch of shims stacked up in the shape of a Christmas tree. The piston. The washer, collar, spring and cap make up a one way valve. Nut to hold it all together.

On the right the order is reversed because the rebound piston controls oil flowing the other way. The shim stack is different because compression and rebound damping are opposite jobs.

Far right is the cartridge rod that the rebound assembly is attached to.

How does this work? The shims bend under the force of the moving oil. This opens the passages in the piston. How strong or weak the stack of shims are determines how much they allow the passage to open and therefore how much damping you have. The oil that has to be controlled is only the amount being displaced by the rod moving farther into the cartridge. Or the same amount being pulled back into the cartridge when the rod retracts. The cartridge is always full of oil. Your shock is a shorter version of this.

I change the shim stack to give you the damping you need. $460 to rebuild and re-valve your stock cartridge forks. No expensive kit needed.

Learn more about the pistons here:

What we have here is a cartridge fork piston comparison.

Contact Us

86305 College View Rd.
Eugene, OR 97405
(909) 838-4587
ed@le-suspension.com